LegalDay - Legal News and Links
Legal Recruitment
Legal Forms

LegalCommentary
Analysis and Views from Legal Practitioners

Employment

Working Time Regulations 1998 - Holiday Pay - Rolled Up Holiday Pay - Working Time Directive - MPB Structures Vs Munro

LegalDay Home Cases CurrentIssues LegalPractice Jobs News SiteMap Search LegalDay Search+


   

Contact    Privacy     Advertise     Use Our Content     Visitor List     Publish on LegalDay     Work for LegalDay

LegalCommentary   Resources

13 May 2003

www.simkins.com

Simkins early warning - Employment

Under the Working Time Regulations 1998, all workers are entitled to a
minimum of 4 weeks' holiday. The regulations state that for each week of
holiday, the employer must pay the individual one week's pay. A practice has
developed of including an element of holiday pay in an individual's salary,
sometimes known as "rolled up" holiday pay. This means that the employer
does not have to pay an individual at the time he or she is on holiday.

The regulations apply to all workers, not just employees. In the film and
television industries, there is a long tradition of engaging freelancers,
who are not employees of the production company. The agreed rates were
deemed to include an element of holiday pay. It is tempting for production
companies to continue this practice and provide for rolled up holiday in the
agreements they enter into with production staff.

Until recently the legitimacy of rolled up holiday pay was unclear, the
Court of Appeal in Gridquest v Blackburn (2002) having declined to make a
finding on the issue. However, a decision last month of the Scottish Court
of Session, MPB Structures Ltd v Munro, has gone some way towards resolving
the uncertainty.

Mr Munro was employed by MPB Structures at its site in Edinburgh and was
paid at a rate of £8.50 per hour. At the same time as accepting an increase
in pay to £10 per hour, Mr Munro signed a contract in which it was stated
that his rate of pay incorporated an 8% allowance for his holiday pay.

The main question for the court was whether the payment of holiday pay as
part of a weekly rolled up rate was lawful or whether the holiday pay must
be paid when the leave is taken. In interpreting the regulations, the court
considered the Working Time Directive. It held that it was clear that the
Directive treats the right to annual leave and to payment for it as part of
a single entitlement which itself was supported by the intention of the
Directive to protect the health and safety of workers. The legislators who
drew up the Directive want workers to take holidays. With this reasoning,
the court held that it was essential not only that payment should be made
for annual leave but also that it should be made in association with the
taking of that leave. The rolling up of holiday pay would have the effect of
discouraging workers from taking their holiday and therefore conflicted with
the regulations.

The court concluded by finding that the contractual provision which
attempted to roll up the worker's holiday pay was void. The rate of pay did
not discharge the company's liability in respect of the employee's holiday
pay and could not be off-set against it.

The extent to which this decision is binding on tribunals in England is
uncertain. The risk to employers of being confronted with substantial claims
is however very real. A worker may be able to bring a claim for unpaid
holiday dating back to the introduction of the regulations in October 1998
by utilising the statutory provisions for the unlawful deduction of wages.
Employers who do operate a system of rolled up holiday pay should reconsider
the advantages of doing so.


Rachel Urquhart
13 May 2003
158

If you have any comments on this bulletin or would like further details,
please contact stephen.hornsby@simkins.com (tel: +44 20 7907 3023).
This update is © The Simkins Partnership but you are welcome to forward it
to anyone who may be interested.
This bulletin is for general guidance only. Legal advice should be sought
before taking action in relation to specific matters. Where reference is
made to Court decisions facts referred to are those reported as found by the
Court.
Visit our website at http://www.simkins.com or contact us at
earlywarnings@simkins.com for more information about The Simkins Partnership
media law services or to subscribe to early warnings on any of the following
subjects: Film & TV, Music, Advertising & Marketing, Digital Media,
Defamation & Privacy, Sport, Photography or Employment.
Past bulletins can be found on our website at
http://www.simkins.com/archive/sim_archive.asp .

Sponsored Links




>

 

Related Pages

 

 

 

© Day x Day Media Ltd 2004